At FairBorrow™.Ai, we analyze large and complex data sets along with the power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in developing deep insights. In particular, our proprietary data management process helps to enhance consistency of decisions, such as loan approval and underwriting decisions. Enhancing consistency of decisions could lead to reduction in bias and thus help reduce and even eliminate potential regulatory issues, such as Fair Lending violations and their resulting adverse financial and reputational impact.
At FairBorrow™.Ai, we analyze large and complex data sets using advanced Data Management techniques such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) in developing deep insights. Our proprietary data management process helps to enhance consistency of decisions, such as loan approval and underwriting decisions, potentially leading to a reduction in bias and thus helping reduce or even eliminate potential regulatory issues, such as Fair Lending violations and their resulting adverse financial and reputational impact.
We harness AI to unlock profound insights from public data, including HMDA, ensuring our proprietary data management fosters decision consistency, minimizes bias, and addresses regulatory challenges for financial integrity.



FairBorrow™.Ai enhances decision processes by reducing inconsistencies. Explore various use cases below or share your specific scenario for customized analysis.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Our proprietary, AI-based process enables decision- makers to test their decisions for consistency within their company, region, by product or any other accepted underwriting factor. FairBorrow™.Ai leverages its proprietary AI-based Data Management processes and produces insightful summaries automatically.
FairBorrow™.Ai is not a decisioning model. We do not recommend reversing or changing any loan decisions made on the basis of consistency checks. The purpose of FairBorrow™.Ai is to help identify improvements in the decision-making process itself by understanding the causes of decision inconsistencies. The outcome of an inconsistency check does not imply a right or wrong decision, or any other wrongdoing.
FairBorrow™.Ai does not impose any of its own restrictions or biases in this process and leverages various key risk indictors from within the decision data set to arrive at the insightful conclusion whether the specific decision(s) being checked are consistent or not.
Decision-makers will follow their institution’s policies and procedures to make their decisions, and then check the consistency of their decisions. Such checks inform the decision-makers about opportunities in streamlining their processes.
Our proprietary AI-based process enables decision-makers to test their decisions for consistency within their company, region, by product or any other accepted underwriting factor. FairBorrow™.Ai leverages its proprietary AI-based Data Management processes and produces insightful summaries automatically.
FairBorrow™.Ai is not a decisioning model. We do not recommend reversing or changing any loan decisions made on the basis of consistency checks. The purpose of FairBorrow™.Ai is to help identify improvements in the decision-making process itself by understanding the causes of decision inconsistencies. The outcome of an inconsistency check does not imply a right or wrong decision, or any other wrongdoing.
FairBorrow™.Ai does not impose any of its own restrictions or biases in this process and leverages various key risk indicators from within the decision data set to arrive at the insightful conclusion whether the specific decision(s) being checked are consistent or not.
Decision-makers will follow their institution’s policies and procedures to make their decisions, and then check the consistency of their decisions. Such checks inform the decision-makers about opportunities in streamlining their processes.
A risk manager could be a quality assurance professional, underwriting team manager, or compliance professional including a Fair Lending compliance officer). A risk manager would normally review past decisions for inconsistencies and anomalies to identify potential enhancements in the decisioning process.
In identifying anomalies, FairBorrow™.Ai leverages disparity in decision rates as one of the key risk indicators. Use of Data Driven Artificial Intelligence, with no external assumptions and bias imposed allows a risk manager to quickly identify groups of loans with highest decision anomaly, based on product, geography and any of the factors used in the decisioning process. The presence of anomalies in past decisions does not necessarily indicate any wrong decisions and any other wrongdoing.
A risk manager can leverage such lists of anomalies and AI driven comparative loans to determine what process enhancement would create a more consistent decision process. Increased consistency in decisions
Higher levels of consistency in decision making reduces any potential or perceived bias and produces results that are more closely aligned with business objectives.
A risk manager could be a quality assurance professional, underwriting team manager, or compliance professional, including a Fair Lending compliance officer). A risk manager would normally review past decisions for inconsistencies and anomalies to identify potential enhancements in the decisioning process.
In identifying anomalies, FairBorrow™.Ai leverages the disparity in decision rates as one of the key risk indicators. Use of Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence (AI), with no external assumptions and bias imposed, allows a risk manager to quickly identify groups of loans with the highest decision anomaly, based on product, geography, and any of the factors used in the decision process. (Note, however, that the presence of anomalies in past decisions does not necessarily indicate any wrong decisions and any other wrongdoing.)
A risk manager can leverage such lists of anomalies and AI-driven comparative loans to determine what process enhancement would create a more consistent decision process.
Higher levels of consistency in decision-making reduce any potential or perceived bias and produce results that are more closely aligned with business objectives.
A researcher could be anyone who would like to gain deep AI driven insights into data, which contains charts, summary level information and automatically produced narratives. The researcher neither needs to fully understand the intricacies of the data they are researching, nor do they need to be concerned with Data Science.
Our proprietary Data Management Processes allow simple chat interface, to guide the researcher into the best choices possible for these deep insights. Chat interactions are kept strictly confidential and rea used for improving the experience.
FairBorrow™.Ai produces deep insights into data and does not impose its own opinions or judgment. We do not recommend for or against any lender or Financial Institution, and the presence of any clickable links in our reports that take you to a Financial Institution’s web site is not a sign of our endorsement. In some cases, we may collect a referral compensation from such a Financial Institution if you do click on their link. Please see our Privacy policy for further details.
A researcher could be anyone who would like to gain deep AI-driven insights into data, which contains charts, summary level information, and automatically produced narratives. The researcher does not need to fully understand the intricacies of the data they are researching, nor do they need to be concerned with Data Science.
Our proprietary Data Management Processes allow simple chat interface, which guide the researcher into the best choices possible for these deep insights. Chat interactions are kept strictly confidential and are used for improving the experience.
FairBorrow™.Ai is neither a mortgage provider nor a financial institution of any kind. Any information collected by us does not constitute a mortgage application, just as any responses from the FairBorrow™.Ai system to your queries do not guarantee a loan approval, denial, or any specific outcomes such as interest rates.
FairBorrow™.Ai uses its proprietary Data Management Processes and HMDA data to produce deep and easy-to-understand insights for potential borrowers so that they can make informed decisions.
We do not recommend or critique any lender or financial institution. The presence of any clickable links in our reports, which may take you to a financial institution’s or other lender’s web site, is not an endorsement of that financial institution or other lender. In some cases, we may collect referral compensation from such a financial institution if you do click on their link. Please see our Privacy policy for further details.
Disparity is a measure that shows the odds a group of applicants face when compared to another group, based on a specific outcome. For it to be meaningful, care must be taken to measure disparity within applicable parameters. In the lender-oriented example below, two age groups are compared based on the decision status “Originated” as defined within the HMDA Schema.
| GRP | Applicant Age Group | Population | Originated | Origination Ratio | Disparity | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
													GRP 1												 | 
													25-34												 | 
													123,961												 | 
													47,792												 | 
													47792/123961 = 38.55%												 | 
													16.44%												 | 
| 
													GRP 2												 | 
													45-54												 | 
													211,699												 | 
													97,688												 | 
													97688/211699 = 46.14%												 | 
													0%												 | 
The presence of disparity does not imply a shortcoming or defect in the decision-making process or model. It is simply one of the measures for consistency of decisions. Understanding how much and where disparity exists in the data produces actionable intelligence for process enhancements.
The Fair Lending Rules forbid the use of prohibited factors in decision-making. FairBorrow™.Ai leverages only such factors that are permissible for credit decision-making in its analysis. Such factors include income, property value, type of loan, type of product, etc.
A “decision anomaly” is an instance where two similar loans receive different outcomes, such as one being originated, and the other being denied. The presence of a “decision anomaly” does not imply a shortcoming or defect in the decision-making process or model and is simply derived from the presence of a disparity in decisions. The proprietary Data Management Processes at FairBorrow™.Ai can identify decision anomalies from various angles to enable a risk manager to quickly identify potential actions for process enhancement.
Fair Lending-prohibited factors are used as Disparity Factors by FairBorrow™.Ai. These include Age, Gender, Race, Ethnicity, etc. Disparity of decisions is measured within each of these disparity factors.
Driven by the size of the mortgage industry in the USA, and Fair Lending-related regulatory actions, FairBorrow™.Ai is uniquely poised to help address one of the most challenging aspects of the financial services industry.
A fully implemented solution using publicly available Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is available for users. In addition, a financial institution may confidentially and securely provide additional proprietary data for a customized solution. Such solutions can be implemented using FairBorrow™.Ai infrastructure, or within the financial institution’s domain.
All credit-decision processes face similar challenges to the home lending decision process, and will benefit from enhancements of decision consistency. For such use cases, an auto financer or financial institution (in the case of credit cards) may confidentially and securely provide proprietary data for a customized solution. Such solutions can be implemented using FairBorrow™.Ai infrastructure, or within the financial institution’s domain.
Financial institutions are required to have an AML/BSA Program, and often implement automated controls within their processing systems to create alerts. These alerts must be reviewed by AML/BSA personnel, and decision must be made to either close them as false positives, or create a compliance case for further investigation. The compliance cases, upon further investigation could result in filing Suspicious Activities Reports (SARs) and/or Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs), or the case is closed as not requiring any further action.
The process described above is complex and requires expertise-based judgment at multiple steps. It is also a great example of how even though alerts creation is via an automated rules- based model, the final disposition could still have significant inconsistencies.
FairBorrow™.Ai can consume data related to AML/BSA processes confidentially and securely within a financial institution’s domain and produce deep insights as well as identify areas where decision anomalies can be leveraged for process improvements. In addition, much like the case of an underwriter in credit decisions, it would be possible for an AML/BSA team member to check their decision for consistency from within such a process.
Stock trading must adhere to a financial institution’s policies and procedures. Despite employing automated modelling, the capital markets industry has seen significant regulatory action due to potential insider trading. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Enforcement Results for 2023 state that in fiscal year 2023, the SEC obtained orders for $4.949 billion in financial remedies, the second highest amount in SEC history, after the record-setting financial remedies ordered in fiscal year 2022.
Anomalies in trade executions can provide actionable intelligence on how to improve the process and which specific areas should receive a heightened focus, resulting in more consistent trading. For such use cases, a financial institution may confidentially and securely provide proprietary data for a customized solution. Such solutions can be implemented using FairBorrow™.Ai infrastructure, or within the financial institution’s domain.
Similar to the loan application approval process, an insurance policy underwriting decision is based on various factors, such as coverage requested. Despite the use of automated models, insurance underwriting can still suffer from inconsistencies due to judgmental processes around use of such automated models.
FairBorrow™.Ai can consume data related to insurance policy underwriting processes confidentially and securely, either within an insurer’s domain or within FairBorrow™.Ai, and produce deep insights while pointing out where decision anomalies can be leveraged for process improvements.
Determining the outcome of an insurance claim is often a complicated process, which considers multiple factors such as appraiser’s estimate, policy coverage, etc. FairBorrow™.Ai can consume data related to insurance claims adjudication and provide deep insights, particularly, where anomalies and inconsistencies exist. These insights can help a risk manager identify which areas need improvements.
In addition, a claims adjudicator can check for consistency of decisions and garner insights that help them improve their own performance via improved consistency.